﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-210X</Issn>
      <Volume>9</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <DAY>04</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Diagnostic Accuracy of Charge-coupled Device Sensor and Photostimulable Phosphor Plate Receptor in the Detection of External Root Resorption In Vitro</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>18</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>22</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.15171/joddd.2015.004</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Shirin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sakhdari</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Zohreh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khalilak</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Elham</FirstName>
        <LastName>Najafi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Rezvaneh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Cheraghi</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.15171/joddd.2015.004</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background and aims. Early diagnosis of external root resorption is important for accurate treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plate receptor in the diagnosis of artificial external root resorption. Materials and methods. In this diagnostic in-vitro study, 40 maxillary incisors were mounted in a segment of dry bone and preliminary radiographs were obtained using CCD and PSP sensors. Artificial resorption cavities were produced on the middle-third in half of the samples and on the cervical-third in the other half on the buccal root surfaces. Radiographs were repeated and images were evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed using chi-square and diagnostic tests. Results. There were no significant differences between the two sensors in the sensitivity (p=0.08 and 0.06) and specificity (p=0.13) for the diagnosis of resorption in both root areas. The overall accuracy of CCD was higher than PSP sensor; how-ever, the difference was not statistically significance (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion. CCD and PSP sensors chosen for the present study produced similar results in diagnosing simulated external root resorption. Key words: Dental</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Dental radiography</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">digital radiography</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">root resorption</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>