﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-210X</Issn>
      <Volume>9</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <DAY>16</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Effect of Adhesive Pretreatments on Marginal Sealing of Aged Nano-ionomer Restorations</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>144</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>150</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.15171/joddd.2015.028</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Fereshteh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shafiei</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sahar</FirstName>
        <LastName>Akbarian</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Karim Etminan</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.15171/joddd.2015.028</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>21</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background and aims. Nano-ionomer (NI) interacts with tooth structures superficially, and there is a concern about the enamel bonding ability of mild self-etch Ketac primer. This study compared the effect of different adhesive procedures (self-etching and etch-and-rinse approach) on long-term marginal microleakage of nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer (NI) cervical restorations.Materials and methods. Class V cavities were prepared on 72 maxillary premolars. The teeth were divided into six groups: G1: No treatment (NC); G2: Ketac primer (K primer); G3: Etchant + Ketac primer (E+K primer); G4: Self-etch adhesive (Bond Force); G5: Etchant + Bond Force (E+Bond Force); G6: Etchant + Adper Single Bond (Etch and rinse adhesive). All the cavities were restored with Ketac N100. The samples were stored in water for 6 months and thermocycled for 2000 cycles. Marginal sealing was assessed using dye penetration technique. Data were analyzed with non-parametric tests (α=0.05).Results. All the adhesive pretreatments resulted in a lower marginal leakage than that of NC (P≤0.01), except for E+Bond Force at the dentin margin. There was no significant difference between K primer and Bond Force. Microleakage differed significantly between K primer pretreatment and E+K primer (P=0.003), E+Bond Force (P=0.002) and etch-and-rinse adhesive (P=0.001) at the enamel margin, but it did not differ at the dentin margin. E+ Bond Force group showed insignificantly lower leakage at the enamel margin and significantly higher leakage at the dentin margin (P=0.02).Conclusion. Etch-and-rinse adhesive and selective enamel etching along with self-etch adhesive/Ketac primer might improve marginal sealing of aged nano-ionomer restoration.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Acid etching</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">self-etch adhesive</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">etch-and-rinse adhesive</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">microleakage</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">nano-ionomer</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>