﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-210X</Issn>
      <Volume>6</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Marginal Microleakage of Low-shrinkage Composite Silorane in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>94</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>97</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.5681/joddd.2012.020</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hamid Reza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Poureslami</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Fatemeh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sajadi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Maryam</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sharifi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Shahram</FirstName>
        <LastName>Farzin Ebrahimi</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.5681/joddd.2012.020</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>04</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <Day>25</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background and aims. Despite the increasing demand for adhesive restorations in pediatric dentistry, polymerization shrinkage and subsequent marginal microleakage remains a problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate of the sealing ability of novel low-shrinkage composite silorane in class V cavity of primary canines in comparison with three types of composite resin. Materials and methods. Ninety-one non-carious extracted primary canines were randomly divided in six groups (n=15). Standard class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of each tooth that the occlusal margin was in the enamel and the cervical margin extending 1 mm below the cemento-enamel junction. The preparations were restored with the different composite materials in normal consistency with application the bonding in six groups (Filtek silorane; etch + Filtek Silorane; Z250; Filtek supreme; els saremco; Aelite LS). Teeth were then exposed to thermal cycles (1000 cycles, 5°C and 55°C), sealed and immersed in a 0.5% basic fuchsine for 24 hours, and finally sectioned. Buccolingual and marginal leakage was assessed with dye penetration. Results. The best seal were obtained with etch + Filtek Silorane (P &lt; 0.05) and the weakest seal with Z250 composite restorations (P &gt; 0.05). Except for etch + silorane, there was no significant differences in sealing ability (P &gt; 0.05), and in the microleakage degree at the cementum and enamel margins (P &gt; 0.05) between the groups. Conclusion. According to the results, low-shrinkage silorane composite restorations with etching the cavity provide the highest seal in primary teeth.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Microleakage</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">polymerization</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">shrinkage</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>