﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-210X</Issn>
      <Volume>12</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <DAY>20</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Efficacy of novel thermomechanically treated reciprocating systems for gutta-percha removal from root canals obturated with warm vertical compaction</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>110</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>115</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.15171/joddd.2018.017</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Cangul</FirstName>
        <LastName>Keskin</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Evren</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sarıyılmaz</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Duygu Hazal</FirstName>
        <LastName>Güler</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.15171/joddd.2018.017</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>25</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background. The present study aimed to test the efficacy of novel reciprocating systems in terms of gutta-percha removal from root canals obturated with warm vertical compaction technique. Methods. Ninety straight-rooted maxillary incisors were enlarged with hand files up to a #50/02 apical size and obturated using warm vertical compaction technique. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the system used for removal of obturating material: Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, WaveOne Gold and hand instrumentation. The residual filling materials and time required for root canal removal were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests at 5% significance threshold. Results. There were no significant differences among Reciproc, Reciproc Blue and WaveOne Gold (P&gt;0.05). The hand instrumentation group exhibited significantly more resisual root canal filling material (P&lt;0.05). The time required for root canal filling removal was significantly shorter in the Reciproc group followed by WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue and hand instrumentation groups (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion. Efficacy of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold and Reciproc instruments for root canal filling removal were similar and superior to hand instrumentation.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Reciproc Blue</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">WaveOne Gold</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Root canal filling material removal</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>