﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-210X</Issn>
      <Volume>12</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <DAY>26</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Apically extruded debris and irrigants during root canal filling material removal using Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, R-Endo and ProTaper Next systems</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>272</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>276</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.15171/joddd.2018.042</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Cangul</FirstName>
        <LastName>Keskin</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Evren</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sarıyılmaz</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.15171/joddd.2018.042</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>25</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>18</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background. The present study aimed to compare the amount of apically extruded debris and irrigants produced by various nickel-titanium instruments. Methods. A total of 100 single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth were root canal treated and prepared for agar gel model. The root canal fillings were removed using Reciproc Blue, ProTaper Next, R-Endo, WaveOne Gold systems or hand instrumentation. The mean weights of apically extruded materials were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni tests. Results. Hand instrumentation resulted in significantly more debris and irrigants than other systems (P&lt;0.05). The mean amount of apically extruded debris and irrigants produced by Reciproc Blue system was significantly greater than motordriven instruments (P&lt;0.05). No significant difference was detected between ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold systems (P&gt;0.05), while they both produced significantly less apically extruded material than R-Endo system (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion. All the instruments caused apical extrusion. ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold systems were associated with significantly less apical extrusion.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Agar gel model</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">apical extrusion</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">retreatment</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">nickel-titanium</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>