﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-210X</Issn>
      <Volume>18</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <DAY>29</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Effect of thermomechanical loading on fracture resistance and failure mode of new pressable zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate onlay restoration</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>29</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>36</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34172/joddd.40843</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Walid A.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Abdelhady</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3086-4438</Identifier>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohamed F.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Metwally</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Khaled M.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haggag</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.34172/joddd.40843</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2023</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>17</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background. Insufficient information exists regarding the fracture resistance and failure pattern of newly developed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate (ZL, Vita Ambria) onlays. This in vitro study compared the fracture resistance of two types of onlays: monolithic lithium disilicate (LD) and monolithic ZL. Methods. Forty-eight ceramic onlay restorations were fabricated on epoxy dies using a maxillary first premolar model. The samples were divided into two main groups: LD and ZL. Half of each group was subjected to thermomechanical fatigue loading (TML) using a chewing simulator. All the samples were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Subsequently, they were loaded until failure in a universal testing machine, and the fracture patterns and resistance were recorded. Results. Before TML, ZL demonstrated the highest statistically significant mean fracture resistance (499.76±34.14N) compared to LD (470.40±27.38N). After TML, ZL showed the highest non-statistically significant mean fracture resistance (429.27±131.42N), while LD’s mean fracture resistance decreased (377.31±62.18N). Conclusion. Monolithic zirconia-reinforced onlays demonstrated higher fracture resistance and a more favorable failure mode compared to LD. However, the impact of thermomechanical aging resulted in reduced fracture resistance for both materials, with a notable preference observed for ZL.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Fracture resistance</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Lithium disilicate</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Onlay restorations</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Thermomechanical loading</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>