Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015;9(1): 18-22.
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.004
PMID: 25973149
PMCID: PMC4417488
  Abstract View: 971
  PDF Download: 770

Original Research

Diagnostic Accuracy of Charge-coupled Device Sensor and Photostimulable Phosphor Plate Receptor in the Detection of External Root Resorption In Vitro

Shirin Sakhdari 1*, Zohreh Khalilak 2, Elham Najafi 3, Rezvaneh Cheraghi 4

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, Maxillofacial Research Center,Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran- Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Endodontics, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran- Iran
3 Post-graduate Student, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4 MS of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health at Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: sh_sakhdari@dentaliau.ac.ir

Abstract

Background and aims. Early diagnosis of external root resorption is important for accurate treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plate receptor in the diagnosis of artificial external root resorption. Materials and methods. In this diagnostic in-vitro study, 40 maxillary incisors were mounted in a segment of dry bone and preliminary radiographs were obtained using CCD and PSP sensors. Artificial resorption cavities were produced on the middle-third in half of the samples and on the cervical-third in the other half on the buccal root surfaces. Radiographs were repeated and images were evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed using chi-square and diagnostic tests. Results. There were no significant differences between the two sensors in the sensitivity (p=0.08 and 0.06) and specificity (p=0.13) for the diagnosis of resorption in both root areas. The overall accuracy of CCD was higher than PSP sensor; how-ever, the difference was not statistically significance (p>0.05). Conclusion. CCD and PSP sensors chosen for the present study produced similar results in diagnosing simulated external root resorption. Key words: Dental
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 972

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 770

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 15 Mar 2015
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)