Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(1): 9-16.
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.002
PMID: 27092209
PMCID: PMC4831615
  Abstract View: 1071
  PDF Download: 917

Original Research

Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs

Ghazaleh Ahmadizenouz 1*, Behnaz Esmaeili 1, Arnica Taghvaei 2, Zahra Jamali 3, Toloo Jafari 1, Farshid Amiri Daneshvar 4, Soraya Khafri 5

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2 Dental Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: gazalehahmadidds@gmail.com

Abstract

Background. Repairing aged composite resin is a challenging process. Many surface treatment options have been proposed to this end. This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of nano-filled composite resin repairs.Methods. Seventy-five cylindrical specimens of a Filtek Z350XT composite resin were fabricated and stored in 37°C distilled water for 24 hours. After thermocycling, the specimens were divided into 5 groups according to the following surface treatments: no treatment (group 1); air abrasion with 50-μm aluminum oxide particles (group 2); irradiation with Er:YAG laser beams (group 3); roughening with coarse-grit diamond bur + 35% phosphoric acid (group 4); and etching with 9% hydrofluoric acid for 120 s (group 5). Another group of Filtek Z350XT composite resin samples (4×6 mm) was fabricated for the measurement of cohesive strength (group 6). A silane coupling agent and an adhesive system were applied after each surface treatment. The specimens were restored with the same composite resin and thermocycled again. A shearing force was applied to the interface in a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests (P < 0.05).Results. One-way ANOVA indicated significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05). SBS of controls was significantly lower than the other groups; differences between groups 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 were not significant. Surface treatment with diamond bur + 35% phosphoric acid resulted in the highest bond strength.Conclusion. All the surface treatments used in this study improved the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite resin used.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1072

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 917

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 03 Apr 2016
Accepted: 07 Apr 2016
ePublished: 07 Apr 2016
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)