Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(3): 148-154.
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.024
PMID: 27651880
PMCID: PMC5025215
  Abstract View: 968
  PDF Download: 924

Original Research

Comparison of multiple rebond shear strengths of debonded brackets after preparation with sandblasting and CO<sub>2</sub> laser

Mojgan Kachoei 1, Amir Mohammadi 2, Maziar Esmaili Moghaddam 3, Sahand Rikhtegaran 4, Mahmoud Pourghaznein 5, Sajjad Shirazi 6,7*

1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
6 Research Fellow and Lecturer, Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
7 Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: s.shirazi.tbzmed88@gmail.com

Abstract

Background. Failure of orthodontic bracket bonds is a common occurrence during orthodontic treatment. Different techniques have been suggested in the literature to remove resin residues from the bracket bases and enamel surfaces to prepare the surfaces again after debonding. This study attempted to compare multiple rebond shear strengths (SBS) of debonded brackets following preparation with sandblasting and CO<sub>2</sub> laser. Methods. The brackets were bonded on 30 human and bovine maxillary central incisors using self-curing composite resin. SBS was measured using Hounsfield testing machine. The brackets were rebonded for two other times after composite resin residues on their surfaces were removed, either with air abrasion or CO<sub>2</sub> laser. The debonded brackets and enamel surfaces were also evaluated after each debonding procedure under a stereomicroscope in order to determine adhesive remnant index (ARI). SBS of debonded brackets after each step were compared between sandblast and CO<sub>2</sub> laser groups. Results. We observed significant differences in SBS values between pre-recycling and first (P = 0.04), second (P = 0.007) and third recycling (P = 0.007) with laser. Recycling with sandblasting resulted in a decrease in SBS after the first and second recycling procedure; however, the SBS increased after the third recycling procedure, with no significant differences. Conclusion. SBS of brackets after recycling with sandblasting and laser beams was not significantly different, and both were at a favorable level. However, repeating the recycling procedure with sandblasting resulted in more favorable SBS compared to laser.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 969

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 924

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 28 Aug 2016
Accepted: 28 Aug 2016
ePublished: 28 Aug 2016
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)