Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2011;5(1): 5-9.
  Abstract View: 702
  PDF Download: 537

Original Article

Efficacy of Hydrophobic Layer On Sealing Ability of Dentin Adhesive Systems in Class V Composite Resin Restorations

Fatemeh Maleknejad 1*, Saied Mostafa Moazzami 1, Elham Baradaran Naseri 2, Ehsan Baradaran Nasseri 3

1 Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Dentist, Private Practice, Mashhad, Iran
3 Postgraguate Student, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran *
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding Author; , Email: maleknejadf@mums.ac.ir

Abstract

Background and aims. Adhesive permeability is hindered by application of an additional layer of hydrophobic resin, which increases its concentration within the hydrophilic layer, reduces its affinity to water, and enhances its physical properties. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a hydrophobic layer on the microleakage of class V composite restorations using different adhesives.

Materials and methods. The adhesives including total-etch Scotchbond MP and Single Bond, and the self-etch Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil S3 Bond were applied to 80 class V cavities in vitro on the buccal surface in CEJ and then were followed by hydrophobic resin (Margin Bond) in half of the cavities in each group (n=10). After restoration with microhybrid composite, Z100 and immersion in fuchsine, the degree of microleakage was assessed. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Man-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests.

Results. The hydrophobic layer significantly reduced the microleakage of Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil S3 Bond only in dentin (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between enamel and dentinal margins in Clearfil S3 Bond, Clearfil SE Bond plus Margin Bond, and Clearfil S3 Bond plus Margin Bond (p>0.05).

Conclusion. Within the limitation of this study, only Clearfil S3 Bond could demonstrate the identical values of microleakage in enamel and dentinal margins.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 703

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 537

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 11 Oct 2010
Accepted: 15 Feb 2011
ePublished: 25 Jun 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)