Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012;6(3): 89-93.
doi: 10.5681/joddd.2012.019
PMID: 22991644
PMCID: PMC3442429
  Abstract View: 692
  PDF Download: 586

Original Article

Comparison of the Effect of Three Cements on Prevention of Enamel Demineralization Adjacent to Orthodontic Bands

Mehdi Kashani 1, Sareh Farhadi 2*, Neda Rastegarfard 3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
3 Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author; , Email: dr.sfarhadi@gmail.com

Abstract

Background and aims. This in vitro study was designed to compare enamel demineralization depths adjacent to bands cemented with zinc polycarboxylate, glass ionomer (GI) and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI), in order to achieve minimal enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment.

Materials and methods. Sixty fully developed extracted third molars were randomly divided into three test groups each containing 20 samples, used to cement orthodontic bands with zinc polycarboxylate, GI and RMGI. All samples were demineralized using White method using hydroxyapatite, latic acid and Carbapol for in vitro caries simulation, and then, immersed in 10% solution of methylene blue. The mean depth of dye penetration was assessed up to 0.1 millimeter, reflecting the depth of enamel demineralization. One way ANOVA and LSD statistical tests were employed to evaluate significant differences among groups.

Results. The highest dye penetration depth was seen in zinc polycarboxylate group, followed by GI, and RMGI groups, respectively, with significant differences among each two groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion. The use of RMGI cement seems to present significantly better prevention of enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontics bands.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 693

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 586

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 11 Dec 2011
Accepted: 08 May 2012
ePublished: 26 Jun 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)