Abstract
Background and aims. One of the major problems of all-ceramic restorations is their probable fracture under occlusal
force. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare the effect of two marginal designs (chamfer and deep chamfer)
on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic restorations, CERCON.
Materials and methods. This in vitro study was carried out with single-blind experimental technique. One stainless
steel die with 50’ chamfer finish line design (0.8 mm deep) was prepared using a milling machine. Ten epoxy resin dies
were prepared. The same die was retrieved and 50' chamfer was converted into a deep chamfer design (1 mm). Again ten
epoxy resin dies were prepared from the deep chamfer die. Zirconia cores with 0.4 mm thickness and 35 µm cement space
were fabricated on the epoxy resin dies (10 chamfer and 10 deep chamfer samples). The zirconia cores were cemented on
the epoxy resin dies and underwent a fracture test with a universal testing machine and the samples were investigated from
the point of view of the origin of the failure.
Results. The mean values of fracture resistance for deep chamfer and chamfer samples were 1426.10±182.60 and
991.75±112.00 N, respectively. Student’s t-test revealed statistically significant differences between the groups.
Conclusion. The results indicated a relationship between the marginal design of zirconia cores and their fracture resistance.
A deep chamfer margin improved the biomechanical performance of posterior single zirconia crown restorations,
which might be attributed to greater thickness and rounded internal angles in deep chamfer margins.