Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2010;4(2): 56-59.
  Abstract View: 719
  PDF Download: 624

Original Article

Clinical Evaluation of Reasons for Replacement of Amalgam Restorations in Patients Referring to a Dental School in Iran

Firoz Pouralibaba 1*, Mohammad Joulaei 2, Atabak Kashefimehr 3, Farzaneh Pakdel 1, Zahra Jamali 4, Ali Esmaeili 5

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author; , Email: fpuralibaba@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background and aims. The present study evaluated the most common reasons for replacing amalgam restorations in a university clinic.

Materials and methods. A total of 217 restorations which needed to be replaced were clinically and radiographically evaluated in a period of 4 months. The frequencies of reasons for replacing amalgam restorations were calculated: The assessed items included recurrent caries, tooth structure fracture (functional or non-functional cusps), amalgam bulk fracture, amalgam marginal fracture, proximal overhangs, and esthetics. Data were analyzed using Fischer’s exact test.

Results. Both in vital teeth and teeth which had undergone root canal therapy, the most common reason for amalgam replacement was cusp fracture, with the fracture of non-functional cusps being statistically significant. Recurrent caries was the second most common reason for amalgam replacement. In Class I restorations, the most common reasons were recurrent caries and esthetics, with no statistical significance. The most frequent problem in Class II restorations was fracture of nonfunctional cusps, with a statistical significance in three-surface restorations.

Conclusion. According to the results, failing to reduce undermined cusps and neglectful caries removal are the reasons for majority of amalgam restoration replacements. These issues should be emphasized in the curriculum for dental students and continuing education courses.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 720

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 624

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 24 Jul 2009
Accepted: 31 Jan 2010
ePublished: 30 Jun 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)