Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008;2(2): 63-67.
  Abstract View: 673
  PDF Download: 508

Original Article

A Twenty-year Survey of Pathologic Reports of Two Common Types of Chronic Periapical Lesions in Shiraz Dental School

Laaya Safi 1*, Alireza Adl 1, • Mohammad Reza Azar 1, Raheleh Akbary 2

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Iran
2 Dentist, Private Practice, Shiraz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: * Corresponding Author; , Email: safia@sums.ac.ir

Abstract

Background and aims. Accurate differential diagnosis between radicular cysts and periapical granulomas cannot be made from radiographs alone. Histological prevalence studies, therefore, assume special importance and may aid the clinician in making judgments regarding therapy. The incidence of radicular cysts has ranged with wide discrepancies in data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate recorded pathologic reports of two common types of chronic periapical lesion in Shiraz Dental School.

Materiasl and methods. In this study, biopsy reports of 227 specimens of chronic periapical lesions were reviewed. The following information was extracted from each report: patient’s gender, age, tooth associated with the lesion and the pathological diagnosis. Probable significant differences in the occurrence of lesions between different ages and genders were analyzed using chi-square test.

Results. 15.9% of the lesions were granulomas, and 84.1% were cysts. A slight difference in the occurrence of the lesions was found between males and females with no statistical significance (P > 0.005). The highest incidence of both lesions was in the third decade of life. No significant differences were found in age distribution of the lesions. The most common location for two lesions was the maxillary anterior teeth.

Conclusion. Histological differentiation between cysts and granulomas is not always accurate and serial sectioning of excisional biopsies is more valuable than randomized sectioning of curetted biopsies.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 673

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 508

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 10 Jan 2008
Accepted: 22 Apr 2008
ePublished: 03 Jul 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)