Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008;2(2): 48-52.
  Abstract View: 744
  PDF Download: 420

Original Article

Comparing the Disinfecting Efficacies of Micro 10, Deconex, Alprocid and Microzid AF on the Microorganisms on Radiographic Equipments

Fatemeh Ezoddini Ardakani 1, Hengameh Zandi 2, Zahed Mohammadi 3*, Jamshid Ayatollahi 4, Fatemeh Ayatollahi 5, Behnaz Behniafar 5

1 Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, Iran
5 Undergraduate Dental Student, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, Iran
*Corresponding Author: * Corresponding Author, , Email: mohammadi_zahed@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background and aims. The exposure and processing of dental radiographs are not routinely associated with the spatter of blood or saliva; however, infection control is still an issue resulting from contaminated equipment, supplies, film packets or cassettes. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy of four commercially available disinfectants on microorganisms present on the equipment of radiology department.

Materials and methods. Samples from twelve sites of the radiology department were collected using a sterile swab smeared with normal saline, which was then dipped in a test tube. Experimental surfaces were then disinfected by the spray-wipe-spray method using one of Micro 10, Deconex, Alprocid or Microzid AF disinfectants, followed by resampling. The samples were subsequently cultured on blood agar and EMB plates and the colonies were counted. Isolates were identified by biochemical tests. For statistical analysis, Wilcoxon signed ranks test, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used.

Results. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci had the highest and Lactobacillus spp. had the lowest prevalence before disinfection. There were significant differences between the cfu/mL of bacteria before and after disinfection with any of the four disinfectant solutions. There was a significant difference between efficacy of Deconex and Alprocid (P = 0.014), Deconex and Microzid AF (P = 0.001), and Deconex and Micro 10 (P = 0.001).

Conclusion. According to the results, Deconex has the highest disinfectant efficacy compared to other solutions.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 744

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 420

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 05 Feb 2008
Accepted: 05 Apr 2008
ePublished: 03 Jul 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)