Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008;2(1): 1-8.
  Abstract View: 842
  PDF Download: 665

Original Article

A Clinical Comparison of Cerabone (A Decalcified Freeze-dried Bone Allograft) with Autogenous Bone Graft in the Treatment of Two- and Three-wall Intrabony Periodontal Defects: A Human Study with Six-month Reentry

Nader Abolfazli 1*, Fariba Saleh Saber 2, Ardeshir Lafzi 3, Amir Eskandari 1, Sarah Mehrasbi 4

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran
4 Periodontist, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author, , Email: abolfazli@tbzmed.ac.ir

Abstract

Background and aims. Complete and predictable regeneration of tissue lost as a result of infection or trauma is the ultimate goal of periodontal therapy. Various graft materials have been successfully used in the treatment of intrabony defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (Cerabone) with the autogenous bone graft as a gold standard in the treatment of human two- or three-wall intrabony periodontal defects.

Materials and methods. This split-mouth study was done on 10 pairs of matched two- or three-wall intrabony periodontal defects with 5 mm or more probing depth and 3 mm or more depth of intrabony component following phase I therapy. In the control sites autogenous bone graft and in the test sites decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft were used.

Results. At baseline, no significant differences were found in terms of oral hygiene and defect characteristics. At six months, analysis showed a significant improvement in soft and hard tissue parameters for both treatment groups as compared to preoperative measurements. There were no statistical differences in clinically-measured parameters between treatment groups after 6 months except for crestal resorption that increased significantly in control group (P = 0.25). Defect resolution and bone fill in the test and control groups were 2.5 ± 0.46 mm versus 2.7 ± 0.73 mm and 2 ± 0.62 mm versus 2.20 ± 0.52 mm, respectively.

Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrated that both graft materials improved clinical parameters. The comparison of the two treatment groups did not show any significant differences in clinical parameters after six months. However, because of the limited amount of intra-oral donor bone, it is preferable to use decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 842

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 665

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 22 Nov 2007
Accepted: 06 Feb 2008
ePublished: 03 Jul 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)