Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007;1(1): 19-25.
  Abstract View: 840
  PDF Download: 480

Original Article

Assessment of Intra- and Inter-examiner Reproducibility of Probing Depth Measurements with a Manual Periodontal Probe

Ardeshir Lafzi 1*, Adileh Shir Mohammad 2, Amir Eskandari 2, Sohrab Pourkhamneh 3

1 Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
3 Post-graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: * Corresponding author: , Email: ?afzia@tbzmed.ac.ir

Abstract

Background and aims. The main purpose of this study was to assess intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of probing depth measurements with a manual periodontal probe.

Materials and methods. In this study, 32 dental students in Tabriz Faculty of Dentistry with normal periodontium were evaluated. Each tooth of the upper right quadrants, except the third molars, was examined. Probing depths were measured in 6 surfaces of each tooth (mesiofacial, midfacial, distofacial, mesiolingual, midlingual and distolingual). Each patient was examined by two examiners (two periodontists) in two sessions with an interval of 7-10 days. A total of 218 teeth and 1295 surfaces were examined.

Results. Intra-examiner measurements showed no statistically significant differences, while the differences of inter-examiner measurements were statistically significant. Intra-examiner reproducibility was more than the inter-examiner one. Measurements for anterior region, facial and mid-facial/mid-lingual surfaces were more reproducible than posterior, lingual and proximal surfaces.

Conclusion. Probing depth measurements with a conventional probe have an appropriate reproducibility in clinical settings, although variations between examiners may affect the reproducibility, especially when great accuracy is required.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 841

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 480

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 18 Oct 2006
Accepted: 27 Jan 2007
ePublished: 03 Jul 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)