Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12(1): 1-5.
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.001
PMID: 29732014
PMCID: PMC5928468
  Abstract View: 1965
  PDF Download: 1648
  Full Text View: 1083

Basic Research

Original Article

Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Silorane-Based Composite Resin and Methacrylate Based Composite Resin to MTA

Buse Ayse Serin 1*, Muharrem Cem Dogan 2, Hamdi Oguz Yoldas 3

1 Department of pediatric dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cukurova Adana-Turkey
2 Department of Restorative dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cukurova.Adana-Turkey
3 Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Email: dtbuse@hotmail.com

Abstract

Background. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is a material that has recently gained popularity in the application of the vital pulp therapy. Along with the increasing use of MTA to this end, the permanent restoration material to be placed on MTA has become a significant issue. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the bond strength of the novel low-shrinkage silorane-based composite resin (SBC) to MTA. Methods. Twenty acrylic blocks filled with MTA were prepared for this study. SBC was the test group and methacrylate-based composite resin (MBC) was used as the control group. Shear bond strength test was performed to determine the bond strength. The surfaces of broken samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope and grouped as adhesive, cohesive and mixed. Data were examined by statistical analysis. Results. Statistical analysis revealed that SBC exhibited higher shear bond strength than the control group. It was observed that most of the failures in the test group were of cohesive type within MTA. Conclusion. Based on the results, SBC showed higher shear bond strength than the control group; however, clinical follow-up is needed to evaluate the clinical success.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1966

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 1648

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 1083

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 05 Oct 2017
Revision: 13 Nov 2017
Accepted: 20 Nov 2017
ePublished: 14 Mar 2018
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)