Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019;13(2): 133-140.
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.021
PMID: 31592309
PMCID: PMC6773924
  Abstract View: 1543
  PDF Download: 1140
  Full Text View: 636

Clinical Dentistry

Original Article

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity following the use of three different instrumentation techniques: A randomized clinical trial

Mehmet Adiguzel 1*, Pelin Tufenkci 1, ismail Ilker Pamukcu 1

1 Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Email: dt.mehmetadiguzel@gmail.com

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative pain intensity following the root canal preparation carried out with XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chauxde-Fonds, Switzerland), iRace (iRC; FKG Dentaire SA) and Reciproc Blue (REC Blue; VDW, Munich, Germany) files.

Methods. Mandibular molar teeth with asymtomatic necrotic pulps in 69 patients were randomly divided into three groups (n=23). The root canals were prepared using XPS, iRC or REC Blue instruments and obturated using the lateral condensation technique. The patients were asked to record their pain intensity at 24-, 48- and 72-hour and 1-week postoperative intervals on VAS. For intolerable pain after the procedure, ibuprofen (400 mg) was prescribed. Data were analyzed using chi-squared, Friedman, Kruskal–Wallis, and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results. The postoperative pain gradually decreased during the study period in all the groups (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between iRC system and the two other systems at 12-, 24- 48-hour and 1-week intervals (P>0.05). When compared to XPS system, a higher level of postoperative pain was observed with REC Blue system at 24- and 48-hour intervals (P<0.05).

Conclusion. The XPS group exhibited less postoperative pain than the REC Blue group at 24- and 48-hour intervals. iRC, XPS and REC Blue systems were found to be similar in terms of postoperative pain severity.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1544

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 1140

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 636

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 29 Nov 2018
Accepted: 07 Jul 2019
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)