Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020;14(4): 214-217.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.2020.044
PMID: 33575009
PMCID: PMC7867686
Scopus ID: 85118420667
  Abstract View: 1027
  PDF Download: 676
  Full Text View: 248

Basic Research

Intratubular Enterococcus faecalis viability assessment following root canal instrumentation with rotary and reciprocating systems via fluorescence microscopy

Jamileh Ghoddusi 1 ORCID logo, Ehsan Arian 2, Maryam Golmohammadi 3, Maryam Gharechahi 4* ORCID logo, Siavash Moushekhian 1

1 Dental Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, Iran
2 Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Endodontics, Khorasan Shomali University of Medical Sciences, Bojnord, Iran
4 Dental Materials Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding author: Maryam Gharechahi, Email: , Email: gharechahim@mums.ac.ir

Abstract

Background. The present in vitro study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the WaveOne and ProTaper Gold systems in removing the Enterococcus faecalis biofilm.

Methods. Thirty-eight mandibular premolars were selected. The root canals were assigned to standard control (canals serially enlarged with ProTaper Gold S1-S2-F1-F2, n=15) and experimental (canals enlarged with Primary WaveOne file, n=15) groups. Following the instrumentation procedure, the root canals underwent a sampling procedure, and the colonyforming unit (CFU) counts were determined. The samples were also evaluated under a fluorescent microscope to evaluate viable bacteria. The data were analyzed using independent samples t test and paired samples t test.

Results. The results showed that, compared with the ProTaper group, the WaveOne group exhibited the least viable bacteria (P=0.004).

Conclusion. It was concluded that comparison with the ProTaper Gold rotary system, the WaveOne reciprocating file is more successful in reducing intratubular viable bacteria counts.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1028

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 676

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 248

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 07 Jul 2020
Accepted: 17 Sep 2020
ePublished: 02 Dec 2020
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)