Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020;14(3): 187-190.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.2020.031
PMID: 33408825
PMCID: PMC7770400
  Abstract View: 1200
  PDF Download: 648
  Full Text View: 238

Clinical Dentistry

Original Article

Effects of different glide path techniques on the amount of extruded debris and preparation times during root canal preparation

Damla Kırıcı 1* ORCID logo, Simay Koç 1, Alper Kuştarcı 1

1 Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding authors: Damla Kırıcı. Tel:+90- 05058168470 Email:, Email: d_ozsu@hotmail.com

Abstract

Background.This study purposed to compare the effect of new single glide path files on extruded apical debris and total preparation times during root canal preparation with the WaveOne Gold system.

Methods. Thirty-six extracted human lower molar teeth with mesiobuccal canal curvature angles of 25‒35° were randomly splited to three groups. In group 1, the glide path was created with WaveOne Gold Glider (WGG) file at working length (WL); in group 2, the glide path was created with ProGlider file (PG); in group 3, the glide path was not performed. In all the groups, the root canals were shaped with WaveOne Gold Primary (WOG) reciprocating files at WL. Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was picked up into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the dry extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pre- and post-instrumentation weights of the tubes in each group. The total time elapsed during the canal preparation was calculated with a chronometer. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests.

Results. The WGG/WOG group extruded significantly fewer debris than the WOG and PG/WOG groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the WOG and PG/WOG groups (P>0.05). The WGG/WOG and PG/WOG groups were significantly faster than the WOG group.

Conclusion. The amount of debris extruded apically significantly diminished when conventional WGG was implemented before using WOG. The total preparation time significantly diminished when the WOG file was used in combination with reciprocating and rotary glide path preparation techniques.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1196

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 648

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 238

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 01 Mar 2020
Revision: 22 Apr 2020
Accepted: 22 Apr 2020
ePublished: 21 Sep 2020
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)