Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022;16(4): 204-220.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.034
PMID: 37560493
PMCID: PMC10407871
Scopus ID: 85151484770
  Abstract View: 568
  PDF Download: 508
  Full Text View: 99

Clinical Dentistry

Reviews

Dental pulp stem cells for reconstructing bone defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Neda Moeenzade 1 ORCID logo, Mohsen Naseri 2, Fereshteh Osmani 3, Fariba Emadian Razavi 4* ORCID logo

1 Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
2 Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Department of Molecular Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
3 Infectious Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
4 Clinical Research Development Unit, School of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Fariba Emadian Razavi, Email: , Email: emadian_f@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background. Bone reconstruction with appropriate quality and quantity for dental implant replacement in the alveolar ridge is a challenge in dentistry. As dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) could be a new perspective in bone regeneration in the future, this study investigated the bone regeneration process by DPSCs.

Methods. Electronic searches for articles in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were completed until 21 April 2022. The most important inclusion criteria for selecting in vivo studies reporting quantitative data based on new bone volume and new bone area. The quality assessment was performed based on Cochrane’s checklist.

Results. After the title, abstract, and full-text screening of 762 studies, 23 studies were included. A meta-analysis of 70 studies that reported bone regeneration based on new bone area showed a statistically significant favorable influence on bone tissue regeneration compared to the control groups (P<0.00001, standardized mean difference [SMD]=2.40, 95% CI: 1.55‒3.26; I 2=83%). Also, the meta-analysis of 14 studies that reported new bone regeneration based on bone volume showed a statistically significant favorable influence on bone tissue regeneration compared to the control groups (P=0.0003, SMD=1.85, 95% CI: 0.85‒2.85; I2=84%).

Conclusion. This systematic review indicated that DPSCs in tissue regeneration therapy significantly affected bone tissue complex regeneration. However, more and less diverse preclinical studies will enable more powerful meta-analyses in the future.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 569

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 508

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 99

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 07 Jul 2022
Accepted: 02 Dec 2022
ePublished: 30 Dec 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)