Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024;18(1): 29-36.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.40843
  Abstract View: 208
  PDF Download: 149

Basic Research

Original Article

Effect of thermomechanical loading on fracture resistance and failure mode of new pressable zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate onlay restoration

Walid A. Abdelhady 1* ORCID logo, Mohamed F. Metwally 1, Khaled M. Haggag 1

1 Crown and Bridge Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Walid A. Abdelhady, Email: dr.walidawad.dental@azhar.edu.eg

Abstract

Background. Insufficient information exists regarding the fracture resistance and failure pattern of newly developed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate (ZL, Vita Ambria) onlays. This in vitro study compared the fracture resistance of two types of onlays: monolithic lithium disilicate (LD) and monolithic ZL.

Methods. Forty-eight ceramic onlay restorations were fabricated on epoxy dies using a maxillary first premolar model. The samples were divided into two main groups: LD and ZL. Half of each group was subjected to thermomechanical fatigue loading (TML) using a chewing simulator. All the samples were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Subsequently, they were loaded until failure in a universal testing machine, and the fracture patterns and resistance were recorded.

Results. Before TML, ZL demonstrated the highest statistically significant mean fracture resistance (499.76±34.14N) compared to LD (470.40±27.38N). After TML, ZL showed the highest non-statistically significant mean fracture resistance (429.27±131.42N), while LD’s mean fracture resistance decreased (377.31±62.18N).

Conclusion. Monolithic zirconia-reinforced onlays demonstrated higher fracture resistance and a more favorable failure mode compared to LD. However, the impact of thermomechanical aging resulted in reduced fracture resistance for both materials, with a notable preference observed for ZL.

First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 209

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 149

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 17 Nov 2023
Accepted: 29 Jan 2024
ePublished: 29 Mar 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)