Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024;18(3): 219-224.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.41070
PMID: 39386129
PMCID: PMC11459080
Scopus ID: 85204676142
  Abstract View: 205
  PDF Download: 152

Clinical Dentistry

Original Article

Clinical assessment of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated using an intraoral scanner

Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani 1 ORCID logo, Leila Nasiry Khanlar 2, Rahab Ghoveizi 1, Elaheh Beyabanaki 1* ORCID logo

1 Prosthodontics Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 A.T. Still University, Missouri School of Dentistry Oral Health, Kirksville, Mo, US
*Corresponding Author: Elaheh Beyabanaki, Email: e.beyabanaki@gmail.com

Abstract

Background. This in vivo study assessed the accuracy of single-tooth monolithic zirconia crowns made using an intraoral scanner (IOS) and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology.

Methods. Thirty patients requiring single posterior crowns were selected. The teeth were prepared with a deep chamfer finish line with a 1-mm extension subgingivally and a 1-mm reduction in all surfaces by one prosthodontist. The gingival margins were retracted using a gingival retraction paste before making impressions using a Trios scanner. All the digital impression files were sent to one laboratory using the dental designer software (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). After completing the milling and sintering processes, the crowns were dyed and glazed. After removing the temporary crown, the qualitative assessment of proximal contacts of definitive monolithic zirconia crowns was performed according to the CDA criteria. Data were analyzed with Friedman’s two-way analysis and independent t-test at α=0.05.

Results. The difference in axial and total gaps between premolar and molar teeth was not significant; however, the mean marginal gap of molars was higher than that of the premolars (P=0.043). Furthermore, the comparison of the axial, total, and marginal gaps between the upper and lower jaws showed no significant difference (P>0.05). The distribution of occlusal and proximal contacts indicated 60% and 66.7% proper contacts and no contacts in 6.7% and 10% of cases, respectively.

Conclusion. Using IOSs could result in accurate monolithic zirconia crowns in terms of adaptation. Also, most occlusal and proximal contacts did not need any adjustments.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 206

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 152

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 13 Feb 2024
Accepted: 17 Jun 2024
ePublished: 07 Sep 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)