Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2026;20(2): 80-87.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.44718
  PDF Download: 1

Basic Research

Original Article

Fracture Resistance and Failure Modes of Ultrathin Occlusal Veneers Made of Different Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study

Mohamed Ezzat Elbanna 1* ORCID logo, Hesham Ibrahim Othman 2, Ahmed Mohammed Leithy Alameldin 2

1 Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Sinai University, North Sinai, Egypt
2 Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Mohamed Ezzat Elbanna, Email: mo7amed3zt@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The current in vitro study was designed to assess the failure mode and fracture resistance of ultrathin occlusal veneers made from different ceramic materials.

Methods: Twenty-four ultrathin occlusal veneers were fabricated on maxillary extracted first premolar teeth. Three ceramic materials were used: lithium disilicate (LDS), zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate (ZLS), and zirconium dioxide (ZIR). An adhesive luting agent was used to adhesively bond occlusal veneers. Each sample was subjected to thermocycling, ranging from 5 to 55°C. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine, and fractured surfaces were examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to assess failure modes.

Results: A statistically significant difference was observed; the highest mean fracture resistance was observed in LDS (1741±308.3 N), followed by ZLS (1192±89.44 N), and then ZIR (866.9±60.23 N), which had the lowest mean fracture resistance. The failure mode of the ZIR group differed significantly from those of the other groups.

Conclusion: All the tested ceramic materials used as ultrathin occlusal veneers exhibited fracture loads significantly higher than the average physiological masticatory forces. Compared with the other two groups, LDS had the highest fracture resistance value. ZIR occlusal veneers exhibited more repairable fractures than LDS and ZLS.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 1

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 15 Mar 2026
Revision: 02 May 2026
Accepted: 01 Jun 2026
ePublished: 30 Jun 2026
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)