Logo-joddd

Visual Abstract

JODDD now with visual abstracts. Authors can now add a visual abstract to their submission.

Platinum* Open Access

*This Platinum Open Access journal publishes articles totally free of charge for the authors and provides unrestricted access to the published content through its website and open access repositories such as PubMed Central.

  Indexing & Abstracting

Following

Social media
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1): 30-34. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2021.006
PMID: 33927838        PMCID: PMC8058151

Original Article

Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study

Neslihan Yılmaz Çırakoglu 1 * ORCID, Yağız Özbay 1

Cited by CrossRef: 7

1- Roshdy N, Hassan R. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris using TRUShape, TruNatomy, and WaveOne Gold in curved canals. BDJ Open. 2022;8(1) [Crossref]
2- Rajnekar R, Mankar N, Nikhade P, Chandak M. Comparative evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using three different rotary file systems. F1000Res. 2023;12:797 [Crossref]
3- Habeeb M. Comparative Evaluation of Debris and Irrigation Extruded Apically Using Different Design of Needles and Penetration Depth - An In Vitro Study. 2023;34(3):266 [Crossref]
4- Muhaibes M, Alwakeel S. Evaluation of apically extruded debris using protaper universal, protaper next, one curve, Xp shaper, and edge file: An in vitro study. 2024;14(1):31 [Crossref]
5- Venkatesh K, Varghese E. Comparative evaluation of cutting efficiency, cyclic fatigue, corrosion resistance, and autoclave cycle effects of three different file systems: An in-vitro micro-CT and metallurgy analysis. J Int Oral Health. 2022;14(6):551 [Crossref]
6- Mohana P, Abraham D, Gurawa A, Gupta A, Chauhan P, Singh A, Jala S. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation with reciprocating single file system, continuous rotary multiple file system and manual technique. 2022;34(2):80 [Crossref]
7- Rajnekar R, Mankar N, Nikhade P, Chandak M. Comparative evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using three different rotary file systems. F1000Res. 2023;12:797 [Crossref]
8- Swathi S, Antony D, Solete P, Jeevanandan G, Vishwanathaiah S, Maganur P. Comparative evaluation of remaining dentin thickness, canal centering ability and apical deformity between ProFit S3 and Protaper gold – A nano CT study. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2024;36(4):650 [Crossref]
9- Al Omari T, Atmeh A, Algahtani F, Dkmak A, Albanna R, Tabnjh A. The effect of irrigation solution temperature and novel heat‐treated rotary files on apical debris extrusion and canal preparation time. Aust Endodontic J. 2024; [Crossref]
10- Sharma A, Nirupama D, Nainan M, Vijay R, Thomas H, Yasin S. Quantitative evaluation of the apically extruded debris from root canals prepared by single-file rotary and reciprocating file systems: An in vitro study. 2024;27(8):860 [Crossref]
11- Al-Saffar F, Al-Gharrawi H, Testarelli L. A Comparative Evaluation of the Apically Extruded Debris from Root Canals Prepared by R-Motion NiTi File System. International Journal of Dentistry. 2023;2023:1 [Crossref]
12- Tanalp J. A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study apical extrusion of debris and irrigants. Int Endodontic J. 2022;55(S1):153 [Crossref]

Featured Prospective Highlight

A novel technique for the impression, model and provisionalization of pinlay
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12(1):77-81