Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(4): 239-246.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.2021.039
PMID: 35070176
PMCID: PMC8760380
Scopus ID: 85125674002
  Abstract View: 801
  PDF Download: 638
  Full Text View: 340

Basic Research

Original Article

Denture base adaptation, retention, and mechanical properties of BioHPP versus nano-alumina-modified polyamide resins

Radwa Mohsen Kamal Emera 1* ORCID logo, Reham Mohammed Abdallah 2,3

1 Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
2 Dental Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
3 Dental Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Horus University, New Damietta, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding author: Radwa Mohsen Kamal Emera, Email: , Email: drradwa@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background. Continuous development of denture base materials has led to the introduction of innovative alternatives to polymethyl methacrylate. The present study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties, adaptation, and retention of alumina nanoparticles (Al2 O3 NPs) modified polyamide resin versus BioHPP (high-performance polymer) denture base materials.

Methods. Four groups of specimens, one control (group I) (unmodified polyamide) and two groups (groups II and III) (2.5 and 5 wt% Al2 O3 NP-modified polyamide, respectively) versus BioHPP specimen group (group IV), were tested for surface microhardness and flexural strength. Complete dentures fabricated from 5 wt% Al2 O3 NP-modified polyamide resin and BioHPP were used to evaluate denture base adaptation and retention.

Results. The higher concentration in the alumina NP-modified polyamide group (5 wt%) demonstrated significantly higher flexural strength values and insignificantly higher hardness values than the lower concentration (2.5 wt%). There was a significant increase in the BioHPP group in both flexural strength and surface hardness compared to all polyamide groups. A statistically insignificant difference was observed between the two denture base materials regarding mean misfit values of the calculated total tissue surface area and four of the total seven evaluated areas. Satisfactory and comparable retention values were observed for both denture base materials.

Conclusion. BioHPP and Al2 O3 NP-modified polyamide resin could be used as a promising alternative denture base material with good adaptation, retention, and mechanical properties.




First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 802

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 638

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 340

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 12 Dec 2019
Accepted: 09 Jul 2020
ePublished: 05 Dec 2021
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)