Logo-joddd
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022;16(3): 159-163.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.027
PMID: 36704183
PMCID: PMC9871171
  Abstract View: 419
  PDF Download: 245
  Full Text View: 34

Clinical Dentistry

Original Article

Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin

Soodabeh Kimyai 1,2* ORCID logo, Zahra Mashayekhi 2, Narmin Mohammadi 2 ORCID logo, Mahmoud Bahari 2 ORCID logo, Mahdi Abed Kahnamouei 2 ORCID logo, Mohammad Esmaeel Ebrahimi Chaharom 2 ORCID logo

1 Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Soodabeh Kimyai, Email: , Email: soodabehkimyai@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background. Considering the increased use of preheating and novel resin-based materials to restore teeth, the present study investigated the impact of preheating on the flexural strength of a giomer and compared it with a nanohybrid composite resin.

Methods. Two restorative materials (Beautifil II giomer and Alpha III nanohybrid composite resin) were used. Thirty rod-shaped samples (adding up to 60 samples) were prepared from the materials above and divided into two subgroups: with and without preheating (n=15). Before sample preparation, the giomer and nanohybrid composite resin tubes were preheated at 68ºC for 15 minutes in the preheating subgroups. In the subgroups without preheating, the tubes were kept in a room at 25ºC. Then the flexural strength was compared between the two groups with two-way ANOVA at a significance level of P<0.05.

Results. The results showed significantly higher flexural strength in the preheated subgroups than in the non-preheated subgroups (P<0.001). In addition, the mean flexural strength values were significantly higher in the giomer groups than in the nanohybrid composite resin groups (P<0.001).

Conclusion. Preheating increased the studied materials’ flexural strengths significantly. The flexural strength of the giomer restorative material was higher than that of the nanohybrid composite resin, irrespective of preheating.

First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 420

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 245

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 34

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 11 May 2022
Accepted: 08 Oct 2022
ePublished: 15 Nov 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)